🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic discussions with Washington provided that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by mediators to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult route since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader declaring the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states used their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in some form if talks restart.

The US president last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He asserted the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the ultimate resolution to address disagreements, but its standards, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the wake of this assault."